Wanting by Richard Flanagan

5825529Fiction — print. Atlantic Monthly Press, 2009. Originally published 2008. 272 pgs. Library copy.

Flanagan’s novel is set in Van Diemen’s Land (present-day Tasmania) and intertwined two storylines set over twenty years apart – Sir John Franklin and his wife, Lady Jane, as they adopt an Aboriginal girl named Mathinna during Sir John’s tenure as governor of Van Diemen’s Land and, later, Charles Dickens as he helps refute (at the request of Lady Jane) a popular story that Sir John resorted to cannibalism once lost in the Arctic.

I picked up this novel for Australian Literature Month largely because of its portrayal of the Tasmanian Aborigines. The novel kicks off with a fantastic start on that front, describing how adoption of English clothing and English food left them sick and dying after losing a war between themselves and white settlers, which the later won. The adoption of Mathinna is largely seen as a social experiment – can the “uncivilized savage” be civilized?

But then Charles Dickens is interjected into the story. His relationship with his wife is on the rocks after the death of their daughter, Dora. In fact, his whole life on the rocks and he interjects his own feelings of being lost and lonely into the play he and Wilkie Collins write refuting the idea that Sir John is now a cannibal. (A little searching after finishing the novel informed me that Sir John Franklin was, in fact, a real and famous Arctic explorer. I had no idea.)

I think it was Flanagan’s attempt to blend these two stories into one that cause the whole thing the fall flat for me. Was it a fictionalized story about Charles Dickens attempting to explain the emptiness and wanting of his writings? Was it a fictionalized story about the injustices done to the Aborigines in the name of civilization? It certainly could not be both because it did not work as both. I could not gel the two stories together in mind; just about the time I would become comfortable with one I would be thrown into the other.

Others’ Thoughts:

Australian Literature Month:

I read this book for Australian Literature Month, hosted by Kim of Reading Matters. The idea is simple: read Australian books in January and share in the love of Australia.  I have read very little Australian literature since I started blogging in 2008, and I thought I would try my hand at reading some more Australian literature.


  1. I agree that it was a bit weird, having two such different stories in one book – I just figured I wasn’t giving it enough thought and there’s probably something really clever about it! I do like his work. And I loved the bit about Franklin, especially as I’ve got Dan Simmons’ The Terror to read and it’s about that doomed exploration.


  2. Like you, I wasn’t convinced of the dual narrative. I’d just get into the swing of one narrative and then I’d have to flip my brain and get used to another. But I found Mathinna’s story fascinating — and heartbreaking.


Please feel free to share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: